As a part of what seems to be a participant security initiative, the NCAA Guidelines Committee is contemplating altering just a few guidelines in an effort to restrict gamers’ “exposures” on the sector. What does that imply precisely? Properly, in accordance with studies, these adjustments are meant to guard participant well being, and will, in flip, shorten video games as properly. Potential rule adjustments like stopping back-to-back timeouts in an effort to “ice” a kicker or eradicating prolonged intervals for untimed downs after defensive penalties are being introduced up however are thought of inconsequential. A way more critical rule change is being thought of although — permitting the sport clock to run after first downs (besides within the final two minutes of every half) and incomplete passes.
The latter is just not being as critically thought of as the previous but, however these are each potential adjustments that will likely be mentioned on the Guidelines Committee’s annual assembly subsequent week. Assuming they cross, how would these adjustments have an effect on the school soccer product? Properly, first issues first, video games could be shorter. That’s effective. No sport has ever improved upon recreation time and seen a decline in leisure. You could possibly argue the alternative has occurred actually. Baseball has seen quite a few enhancements in viewership as they’ve made an effort to get via video games faster. Whereas soccer has by no means skilled such a rule change, the thought of attending to the perfect elements of video games in a speedier vogue doesn’t sound too horrible to me. The ultimate two minutes of every half are all the time essentially the most thrilling a part of an in depth recreation, and as I discussed earlier, the Guidelines Committee desires to maintain the foundations kind of the identical for these pivotal moments. Due to this fact, dashing the sport up in an effort to get to these high-flying drives that get us on the sting of our seats might really be an enchancment.
That stated, there are nonetheless some considerations
School executives have been advised that offenses would lose about seven performs per recreation if the clock was allowed to run after first downs. They might lose 18-20 performs per recreation if the clock ran after incomplete passes. Clearly, the latter is a gigantic drop-off that I wouldn’t wish to see. Whereas seven offensive performs might not seem to be a lot on the floor, that equates to 84 performs in a season, or about one recreation’s value of performs we wouldn’t get to see beneath present NCAA guidelines. Does that matter? Perhaps not. Not solely would 11 video games most likely be sufficient for NFL groups to scout particular gamers on high-profile groups, however with the enlargement of the CFB playoff coming in 2024, those self same high-profile groups will likely be getting an additional recreation to strut their stuff anyway.
The NFL averages nearly 155 performs per recreation (together with particular groups). FBS averages 180. By letting the clock run after first down, that quantity would shrink to 166. Whereas student-athletes not getting paid NFL salaries shouldn’t need to endure way more performs than their skilled counterparts, they’re additionally already enjoying far fewer video games as an entire. Most accidents are sustained through the offseason anyway, and eliminating seven performs per recreation isn’t going to vary that.
Is it actually about participant security?
As I’ve already stated, these doable adjustments are reportedly meant to stop participant accidents, not shorten video games. If the latter was true, apparent adjustments like shortening faculty soccer halftimes would take the forefront. Moreover, CBS studies that performs per CFB recreation have decreased every of the final three seasons, however recreation size has nonetheless elevated from 3 hours, 16 minutes in 2018 to three hours, 21 minutes in 2022. That stated, I’m undecided letting the clock run improves participant security considerably.
G/O Media might get a fee
I perceive that the NCAA desires to make these adjustments with out incurring critical monetary repercussions, however that’s additionally the quickest means to enhance participant security. Shoveling cash into tools analysis or using extra on-site medical workers could be a simple repair, however they don’t wish to spend that cash? To that I say, why make the change in any respect then? Don’t half-ass participant security after which fake to be making adjustments within the title of participant security. That’s unethical, ineffective, and simply downright shady. These adjustments aren’t going to vary something, so cease sitting on a pedestal propping them up.
